1.png)
ARAH PENELITIAN PERUBAHAN IKLIM PADA PRODUKSI TERNAK: ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK
Abstract
Analisis bibliometrik tentang penelitian perubahan iklim dalam produksi ternak menyoroti pentingnya memahami dampak perubahan iklim terhadap produksi ternak dan perlunya strategi adaptasi. Analisis mengkaji tren dan arah penelitian selama dua dekade terakhir dari tahun 2003 sampai 2022. Studi mengidentifikasi fokus penelitian, produktivitas publikasi, dan kesenjangan dalam penelitian. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah mencari artikel yang diekstraksi dan dibangun pada platform Scopus. Pencarian data diperoleh menggunakan program Harzing’s Publish or Perish (PoP). Kata kunci yang digunakan adalah “climate change” OR “climate changes” AND “livestock production”. Hasil pencarian disimpan dalam format RIS/Refmanager dan format CVS, untuk selanjutnya dataset ditarik menggunakan program Mendeley Desktop, Excel, dan VOSviewer 1.6.19. untuk dianalisis. Hasil analisis bibliometrik pengaruh perubahan iklim terdapat produksi ternak didapatkan 973 artikel, 2.653 kata kunci yang membentuk 10 klaster tema artikel. “Climate Change” merupakan jurnal yang banyak mempublikasikan artikel perubahan iklim kaitannya dengan produksi ternak. Beberapa jurnal yang berpengaruh adalah "Climate Change," "Animals," "Animal Production Science," dan "Livestock Research for Rural Development." Artikel-artikel yang banyak disitasi membahas tentang metodologi penilaian dampak lingkungan, dampak perubahan iklim terhadap produksi ternak, dan adaptasi dan mitigasi terkait perubahan iklim. Penelitian tentang perubahan iklim dan produksi ternak, memunculkan novelty atau kebaruan untuk arah penelitian baru di masa yang akan datang.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, P., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Dislich, C., Dodson, J. R., Engström, K., & Moran, D. (2015). Drivers for global agricultural land use change: The nexus of diet, population, yield and bioenergy. Global Environmental Change, 35, 138–147.
Atuhaire, A. M., Boma, P., & Mugerwa, S. (2018). Pasture management Strategies for sustainable livestock production in Karamoja pastoral system, Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30(10), 178.
Belter, C. W. (2015). Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(4), 219.
de Vries, M., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2010). Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science, 128(1–3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2015). Challenging climate change. Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, 300.
Firdaus, N., Supriatna, & Supriatna, J. (2022). Ecosystem services research trends in Indonesia: a bibliometric analysis. Biodiversitas, 23(2), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230255
Gatheru, M., Njarui, D. M. C., & Gichangi, E. M. (2017). On-farm evaluation of improved brachiaria grasses in semi-arid eastern Kenya. Livest. Res. Rural Dev.
Guizheng, W., Limin, H., & Squires, V. (2017). Development impacts on beef and mutton production from the pastoral and agro-pastoral systems in China and the economic and cultural factors that influence it. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 29(10), 1–15.
Henry, B. K., Eckard, R. J., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2018a). Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal, 12(s2), s445–s456.
Henry, B. K., Eckard, R. J., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2018b). Review: Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal, 12(s2), S445–S456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001301
Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., Rising, J., Delgado, M., Mohan, S., Rasmussen, D. J., Muir-Wood, R., Wilson, P., Oppenheimer, M., Larsen, K., & Houser, T. (2017). Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356(6345), 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369
Joy, A., Dunshea, F. R., Leury, B. J., Clarke, I. J., Digiacomo, K., & Chauhan, S. S. (2020). Resilience of small ruminants to climate change and increased environmental temperature: A review. Animals, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050867
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937
Kumar, M., Ratwan, P., Dahiya, S. P., & Nehra, A. K. (2021). Climate change and heat stress: Impact on production, reproduction and growth performance of poultry and its mitigation using genetic strategies. Journal of Thermal Biology, 97, 102867.
Maindi, N. C., Osuga, I. M., & Gicheha, M. G. (2020). Advancing climate smart agriculture: adoption potential of multiple on-farm dairy production strategies among farmers in Murang’a County, Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32(4).
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional de La Información, 29(1).
Naeem, M. A., Karim, S., Rabbani, M. R., Bashar, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Current state and future directions of green and sustainable finance: a bibliometric analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-10-2021-0174
Nardone, A., Ronchi, B., Lacetera, N., Ranieri, M. S., & Bernabucci, U. (2010). Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livestock Science, 130(1–3), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
Nyoni, N. M. B., Grab, S., & Archer, E. R. M. (2019). Heat stress and chickens: climate risk effects on rural poultry farming in low-income countries. Climate and Development, 11(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442792
Palau-Sampio, D., Rivas-de-Roca, R., & Fernández-Peña, E. (2022). Framing Food Transition: The Debate on Meat Production and Climate Change in Three European Countries. Social Sciences, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11120567
Pauna, V. H., Picone, F., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53–62.
Preston, T. R., Leng, R. A., & Gomez, M. E. (2021). Adapting systems of livestock production to be compatible with global commitments to restore the health of planet Earth; ecosystems that remove atmospheric carbon and provide, food, feed and renewable energy. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 33.
Ritchie, H., Reay, D. S., & Higgins, P. (2018). Potential of Meat Substitutes for Climate Change Mitigation and Improved Human Health in High-Income Markets. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00016
Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017a). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16, 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017b). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16, 145–163.
Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Gaughan, J. B., Dunshea, F. R., & Lacetera, N. (2018). Adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal, 12(s2), s431–s444.
Stephan, P., Veugelers, R., & Wang, J. (2017). Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics. Nature, 544(7651), 411–412.
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., & He, Y. (2020). Sustainable land use and management research: a scientometric review. Landscape Ecology, 35, 2381–2411.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/sptr.v5i2.1073
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
