Analisis Efektivitas Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 pada Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Peradilan Agama terhadap Konsistensi Putusan Cearai di Pengadilan Agama Medan: Studi Kasus Tahun 2023-2024

Tuseno Tuseno, Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar

Abstract


The purpose of marriage is to obtain happiness for the married couple. However, it is not uncommon for both of them to feel that after marriage they have not achieved happiness, the goal of the marriage itself has not been achieved. Because the goal of marriage has not been achieved, the right solution is divorce. In order for a marriage to be divorced by the court, it must be proven that the reasons for divorce have been met because if there are no reasons for divorce, the judge will reject the divorce petition so that legally a marriage that does not achieve happiness cannot be divorced. After conducting an analysis of the Medan religious court decision and Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 04 of 2014, it was found that the existence of SEMA has proven effective in filling the legal vacuum. The judge at the Medan Religious Court can interpret the occurrence of a quarrel between husband and wife by looking at the fact that there was a separation between husband and wife. Because indeed, if the reason is that they have separated, the judge is constrained by the rule which requires it to last for 2 (two) consecutive years so that the existence of SEMA Number 04 of 2014 which allows deciding on a divorce even though they have not been separated for 2 (two) years makes it easier for judges to decide on a divorce where they have already been separated. It is proven that from 2023 to May 2024, Medan Religious Court judges have decided on divorce in 4,076 cases.

Keywords


Divorce, Reasons for Divorce, SEMA

Full Text:

PDF 434-444

References


Alhaidar, Nihrul Bahi, Muhammad Muhajir, and Syamsud Dhuha. 2023. “The Closure of Isbat for Polygamous Marriage on Legal Purpose Perspective.” Al-Hukam: The International of Islamic Family Law 13 (01): 1–26.

Arfa, Faisar Ananda. 2010. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam, Cet. 1, Citapustaka Media Perintis.” Bandung.

Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi, Abdul Shomad, and Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti. 2018. “Standard Issuance of Circular Letters in The Implementation of Judicial Power.” SHS Web of Conferences 54 (4).

Cahyadi, Irwan Adi. 2014. “Kedudukan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya.

Indonesia, Mahkamah Agung Republik. 2014. Rumuasan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2013 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sekretariat Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Machado, Carla, Carla Martins, and Sónia Caridade. 2014. “Violence in Intimate Relationships : A Comparison between Married and Dating Couples.” Jurnal of Criminology 2014: 9.

Meliala, Djaja S. 2007. Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Tentang Orang Dan Hukum Keluarga. Bandung: CV.Nuansa Aulia.

Muhajir, Muhammad, and Qurratul Uyun. 2021. “SEMA Waiver Number 3 of 2018 in the Case of Isbat for Polygamous Marriage : Study of Legal Considerations of Judges in Decision Number.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 55 (3).

Nurhayati, and Hendrik Fasco Siregar. 2019. “Aspek Yuridis Status Hukum Anak Dalam Sengketa Perceraian Dan Pembatalan Perkawinan.” Rechtsregel: Jurnal Huku 2 (1): 524–40.

Pakaya, Salahudin, and Adrianto Nalali. 2020. “Political Law Regulation of Judicial Institutions in Exercising the Powers of an Independent Judgment : Before and After Amendments to the 1945 Constitution.” International Journal Papier 1 (2): 119–28.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. n.d. Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.

Rasyid, Wildan Zulfikar. 2024. “Implementasi SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Dikabulkannya Gugatan Perceraian Perspektif Sadd Al-Zari’ah.” Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal BIdang Hukum Islam 5 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v5i1.1297.PENDAHULUAN.

Santoso, Raihan Andhika, Elan Jaelani, and Utang Rosidin. 2023. “Kedudukan Dan Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung ( Sema ) Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia Dari Persoalan Tersebut Timbul Pertanyaan Tentang Bagaimana Kedudukan Daripada Surat Dan Bagaimana Kekuatan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Dalam Hukum Positif Ind.” Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum 1 (4).

Saragih, Yasmiran Mandasari. 2023. “The Law Enforcement of Corruption Crims in Terms of Authority Abuse.” IJLR: International Journal of Law Recontriction 4 (1): 54–62.

Solikin, Nur, and Moh. Wasik. 2023. “The Construction of Family Law in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia: A Review of John Rawl’s Concept of Justice and Jasser Auda’s Maqashid Al-Shari’ah.” Ulumuna 23 (1): 315–40.

Syahrun, Muhammad. 2022. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum:Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi Dan Tesis. Jakarta: CV.DOTPLUS Publisher.

Yasa, Putu Astika, and Made Subawa. 2019. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Perjanjian Kawin.” Kertha Semaya 7 (12): 1–14.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v5i2.1392

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tuseno Tuseno ,Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Rio LAW JURNAL Online ISSN 2722-9602  is Published By Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muara Bungo