MINAT PEMBELIAN PRODUK ORGANIK DI INDONESIA : THEORY PLANNED BEHAVIOR YANG DIKEMBANGKAN DAN PENGETAHUAN PRODUK ORGANIK.
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Saat ini indonesia mencatat luas pertanian organik setiap tahunya mengalami peningkatan namun tidak diiringi dengan operator yang terlibat dalam kegiatan pertanian organik yang sejalan dan cenderung fluktuatif. Di Indonesia, deptartemen pertanian telah mencanangkan program “Go Organik 2010” dimana program tersebut bertujuan agar para petani dan konsumen untuk hidup sehat. Dalam mempengaruhi minat beli produk organik tidaklah mudah dan cenderung rumit sehingga dibutuhkan determinasi pengetahuan (knowledge) produk organik yang harus diberikan kepada konsumen. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara norma subjektif dan sikap pada minat pembelian produk organik dan efek mediasi dengan menggunakan variabel pengetahuan produk ramah lingkungan. Untuk menguji model yang diusulkan, maka pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner online dengan menggunakan pendekatan purposive sampling. Responden yang dipilih adalah mereka yang pernah membeli dan memiliki keininginan untuk membeli produk pangan organik. Dari kuesioner yang telah terkumpul ada 217 responden yang terkumpul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel Knowledge of Green Product tidak dapat memediasi hubungan antara norma subjektif dan sikap pada minat pembelian produk organik pada konsumen di Indonesia.
Kata kunci: NormaSubjektif, Sikap, Pengetahuan Produk Ramah Lingkungan, Minat Pembelian Produk Organik
ABSTRACT
Currently, Indonesia records that the area of organic farming has increased every year, but it is not accompanied by operators involved in organic farming activities which are consistent and tend to fluctuate. In Indonesia, the Department of Agriculture has launched the "Go Organic 2010" program where the program aims to encourage farmers and consumers to live healthily. In influencing the buying interest of organic products is not easy and tends to be complicated, so it takes the determination of the knowledge (knowledge) of organic products that must be given to consumers.This study aims to determine the relationship between subjective norms and attitudes towards purchasing interest in organic products and the effect of mediation by using environmentally friendly product knowledge variables. To test the proposed model, data collection was carried out through an online questionnaire using a purposive sampling approach. Respondents selected are those who have purchased and have the desire to purcahse organic food products. From the questionnaire that has been collected there are 217 respondents who were collected. The results showed that the variable Knowledge of Green Product not mediate the relationship between subjective norms and attitudes towards buying interest in organic products in Indonesian consumers.
Keywords: Subjective Norm, Attitude, Knowledeg of Green Product, Green Food Purchase Intention
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
AOI, A. O. I. (2020). SPOI 2019 Statistik Pertanian Organik Indonesia. (A. R. Firman & D. Dr Wahyudi, Eds.), Sereal Untuk (Vol. 51). Bogor.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
Chen, S. C., & Hung, C. W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: an extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Cheung, M. F. Y., & To, W. M. (2019). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers ’ green purchase behavior, 50(December 2018), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.006
Chrysanthini, B., Sumarwan, U., & Rifin, A. (2018). Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Produk Sayuran Organik (Studi Kasus Konsumen UD Fabela-Myfarm) di Bogor Jawa Barat. MANAJEMEN IKM: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, 12(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.29244/mikm.12.2.151-160
de Medeiros, J. ., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Cortimiglia, M. N. (2016). nfluence of perceived value on purchasing decisions of green products in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod, 110, 158–169.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. (1998). Multi variate data analysis.
Hair, Joseph F, Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (Seven Edit). Person New International Editon. https://doi.org/10.1038/259433b0
Hong, Z., Wang, H., & Yu, Y. (2018). Green product pricing with non-green product reference. Transportation Research Part E, 115(March), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.013
Hsu, C., Chang, C., & Yansritakul, C. (2017). Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34(October 2016), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.10.006
Icek Ajzen, & Martin Fishbein. (1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-012-0060-4
Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., & Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: a conceptual framework and empirical study. J. Retail. Consum. Serv, 34, 1–9.
Li, Y., Lu, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Wang, M., & Jiang, X. (2016). Propensity of green consumption behaviors in representative cities in China. J. Clean. Prod., 133, 1328–1336.
Manalu, V. G. (2018). Dampak surat edaran bpom perihal iklan susu kental manis (skm) terhadap keputusan pembelian pada skm frisian flag di kabupaten kuningan. Indonesian Journal of Strategic Management, 1(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijsm.v1i2.1387
Manalu, V. G., & Adzimatinur, F. (2020). The Effect of Consumer Ethnocentrism on Purchasing Batik Products : Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour ( TPB ) and Price Sensitivity. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3, 3137–3146.
Mancha, R. M., & Yoder, C. Y. (2015). Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.005
Martin, B., & Simintiras, A. C. (1995). The impact of green product lines on the environment. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(4), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509510088991
Moser, A. K. (2016). Consumers’ purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: an empirical analysis of German consumers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv, 31, 389–397.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. . (1994). Psychometric theory, Ed. ke-3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016a). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv, 29, 123–134.
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016b). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 29, 123–134.
Ritter, A. M., Borchardt, M., Vaccaro, G. L. R., Pereira, G. M., & Almeida, F. (2015). Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. J. Clean. Prod, 106, 507–520.
Sumarno. (2010). Green Agriculture dan Green Food Sebagai Strategi Branding Dalam Usaha Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 28(2), 81–90. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.litbang.pertanian.go.id/index.php/fae/article/view/3907/3249
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/jas.v4i2.415
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 JAS (Jurnal Agri Sains)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.