IMPOLITENESS IN TANJUNG AGUNG TRADITIONAL MARKET

Rini Afrilesa, Jelita Untari, Merdeka Putri Kh. R. A, Rina Rina

Abstract


This research investigates linguistic impoliteness used in Tanjung Agung Traditional Market through the examination of impoliteness strategies proposed by Jonathan Culpeper. It examines how impoliteness are used on the traditional market of Tanjung Agung Village. The research uses descriptive qualitative method. First, The writer found that people in the market sometime use impoliteness strategis in daily life, usually can be in the Market. It can be happen between the buyers and sellers conversation to express the negative attitude in the Traditional market. Second, the writers found that four out of the impoliteness in Tanjung Agung Traditional Market

Keywords


Impoliteness Strategies, Traditional Market, Tanjung Agung

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allan,K.,and Burridge,K.,(2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bonvillain,N. (2011). Language, culture, and communication: the meaning of message, 6th Ed.

USA: Pearson Prentice Hall Bousfield,D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction.

Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Brown,P., and Levinson,S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universal sin Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet, 2ndEd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Culpeper,J. (1996). Towards ananatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25:349-367.

Culpeper,J., DerekB., and AnneW. (2003). Impolitenessre-visited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodi caspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545- 1579.

Culpeper,J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link, Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture1:35-72.

Culpeper,J. (2010). Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 42,3232-3245.

Culpeper,J. (2011a). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DenzinN. And LincolnY. (Eds.) (2000). Hand book of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication In c. Duthler, K. W. (2006). The Politeness of Requests Made via Email and Voice Mail: Support for thehyper-personal Model. Journalof Computer-Mediated Communication.Vol.11.P.500–521.

Eelen,G. (2001). Acritiqueof Politeness Theories. Manchester, U.K.: St.Jerome Publishing.

Ige Olamide,B. (2007). Impoliteness in Context: Impoliteness, Genderand Construction of dentitiesat a South African University. Durban: University of Kwa Zulu-Natal.

Kuntjara,E. (2012) . Gender, Bahasa, dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Libri Laitinen,M. (2011). Breaking the Rules of Communication: Verbal and non verbal impoliteness in the American hospital drama House M.D. Finland: University of Jyväskylä

Lakoff,R. (1989). “The limits of politeness.” Multilingua8:101-129.

Locher, M. A. and Derek B. (2008). Introduction. In Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Language, Power and Social Process 21), 1- 13 .Berlinand NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face.Journal of Pragmatics 39:639–656.

Trenholm, S., and Jensen, A. (2008).Interpersonal communication. 6thEd. New York, Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/krinok.v7i1.1101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Krinok : Jurnal Linguistik Budaya  online ISSN  2580-0728  is published by English Literary Department- Faculty of Language at University of Muara Bungo