11.png)
AN ANALYSIS OF HOMONYMY USED IN TANJUNG BELIT DIALECT: A SEMANTICS STUDY
Abstract
The writer analyses the words contain by homonymy used in Tanjung Belit dialect using a semantic study. The purpose of this research is to find out the kinds and explain the meaning of homonymy used in Tanjung Belit dialect.
This analysis uses a descriptive qualitative research as a method and it has three procedures; they are collecting the data, analysing the data and data presentation. In collecting the data, the writer uses the participant observational method. In technique of collecting the data, the writer uses interview and note taking technique. In analysing of the data, the writer uses Sudaryanto's theory that is distributional and translational technique. The last procedure is data presentation, where the data is presented by using the informal method by Sudaryanto.
The result of this analysis is that the writer found fifteen data included in homonymy in the Tanjung Belit dialect. In the fifteen datum that have been analyzed the writer is dominated by complete homonymyKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A, Halim, Rahmatia.(2016).” Analysis of homnymy in Ende-Lio language in Flores NTT region: a semantics study and the connection with learning Indonesian in SMP.”(Thesis S1)”. Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah.
Fromkin, V. (1993).An Introduction to Language.University of California, Loa Angeles.North Carolina State University, Raleign.
Gramley, S.and Patzold, K. (1992). A Survey of Modern English.Second Edition.Routledge and Francis Group.London and New York.
Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction To Sociolinguistic.Learning about Language Longman: London and New York.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Kelima.Aplikasi luring resmi Badan Pengembangan dan pembinaan Bahasa, Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Katz J.J. (1972). Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Kreidler, C. W. (1998). Introducing English Semantics. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group. London and New York.
Leech, G. (1987). Semantics.The Study of Meaning. Second Edition- revised and updated
Lyons, J. (1982).Language and linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.
Mahsun (2005).Metode penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi Dan Tekniknya. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Palmer, F. R. (1984). Semantics A New Out Line.Profesor of Linguistic Science University of Reading.Cambridge University Press Cambridge. London. New York. Melbourne.
Parera, J. D. (2004). Teori Semantik.Edisi kedua.
Pyles, Thomas. (1971). The Origin and Development of the English Language. Sixth Edision.Wadsworth Cengage Learning. New York.
Raga, Amanuel and Adola, Samuel.(2012). “Homonymy as a Barrier to Mutual Inteligibility Among Speakers of Various Dialects of Afan Aromo.”Journal of Language and Culture.
Richards, J.C And Schmidt, R.(2002). Longman Dictionary Of Language Teaching And Applied Linguistics. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
R, Suzanne (1994). Language in Society.An Introduction to Sociolinguistics.Merton college, University of Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Heni, Rusmiati. (2009). “Homonyms in Wonorejo’s Javanese Language (Thesis S1).”English Department di Ponegoro University.
Singh, R. A. (1982). An Introduction to Lexicography: Meaning and its Relationship to Form.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan strategi dan tekniknya. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Watkins, F. C.; Dillingham, W. B.; and Hiers, J.(2001).Practical English Hanbook.11th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/krinok.v8i1.1532
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Krinok : Jurnal Linguistik Budaya online ISSN 2580-0728 is published by English Literary Department- Faculty of Language at University of Muara Bungo