https://www.linuxxstore.my.id/ https://www.belajarhtmldancss.site/ https://www.jasadesignwebsite.my.id/ https://www.giaidacbiet.net/ https://www.yosiwarasaiken.net/ https://www.gaetanodonizetti.net/ https://www.rainbowlanding.com/ https://www.vnfosxd.com/ https://www.maxbet55.my.id/ https://www.desakupekalongan.id/ SBOBET
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN INDEKS PEFORMANCE AYAM BROILER KANDANG SEMI CLOSE HOUSE DAN KANDANG CLOSE HOUSE DI HERAWATI FARM KECAMATAN KUTASARI KABUPATEN PURBALINGGA (STUDI KASUS) | Fridarti | STOCK Peternakan

ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN INDEKS PEFORMANCE AYAM BROILER KANDANG SEMI CLOSE HOUSE DAN KANDANG CLOSE HOUSE DI HERAWATI FARM KECAMATAN KUTASARI KABUPATEN PURBALINGGA (STUDI KASUS)

Fridarti Fridarti, Fajar Panjalu Murbo P, Sari Gando Hidayati, Syafrizal syafrizal, devi Dianti, nazaruddin Nazaruddin

Abstract


This study aims to determine the comparison of semi-closed house cages with close house cages at Herawati Farm which can obtain a large Performance Index in Broiler chicken farming with a comparison of maintenance for one period. The formulation of the problem of this research is how the comparison of the Performance Index of Broiler semi Close House cages with Close House Cages at Herawati Farm. The method in this study uses the Survey method, with data collection using Observation, Documentation and Interview techniques. The Performance Index (IP) obtained in the Broiler farming business at Herawati Farm during one maintenance period in semi Close House cages is better than Close House cages. Semi Close House cages with FCR 1.458, for ABW reached 1.96 and 2.56% depletion while the harvest age was 33.00. In Close House cages the FCR results were 1.508, ABW reached 1.91, with the number of deletions 4.44 and harvest age 33.05. These results are inversely proportional to the hypothesis that the Performance Index (IP) and the largest income are obtained in the Close House cage system. Broiler body weight in semi-closed house cages is higher than in close house cages. Semi Close House cages have an average harvest age of 33.00 days, with a lower FCR (Feed Convertion Ratio) than Close House cages, and a lower Depletion rate compared to Close House cages. However, the Broiler farming business in semi-closed house cages and close house cages at Herawati Farm has an IP that is included in the very good category.

Keywords


broiler chicken, analysis, comparison, cage, close house, semi close house.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnyana, I. P., Mahardika, I. G., & Sukanata, I. W. 2020. Perbandingan Dua Sistem Kemitraan Ayam Broiler Pada Kandang Closed House. Jurnal Peternakan Tropika, 8(2), 396-406.

Alam, S. 2018. Terampil Mengoperasikan Broiler Closed House. Infovet Majalah Peternakan dan Kesehatan. www.majalahinfovet.com. [01/03/2023].

Armelia, V., Ismoyowati, I., & Setianto, N. A. 2022. Produktivitas Usaha Peternakan Ayam Menggunakan Tipe Kandang Open House, Semi Closed House Dan Closed House. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan, 10(1).

Kusuma, R., Pramudito, O., & Erwin, E. 2023.Analisis Indeks Performance Dan Pendapatan Usaha Ternak Ayam Broiler Kandang Semi Close House Gomin Farm Di Desa Pagubugan Kabupaten Cilacap. Studi Kasus. Jurnal Embrio, 15(1), 23-35.

Mellani, R. 2022. Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi Dan Kinerja Karyawan Terhadap Produktivitas Ayam Petelur Menggunakan Jenis Kandang Closed House Dengan Kandang Open House Dalam Persepektif Ekonomi Islam. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan. Lampung.

Mukminah, N dan R. Purwasih. 2019. Profitabilitas Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Dengan Tipe Kandang Yang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Teknologi Rekayasa 2(1): 8-13.

Nasyuha, A. H., & Hafizah, H. 2020. Implementasi Teorema Bayes Dalam Diagnosa Penyakit Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 4(4), 1062-1068.

Nuryati, T. 2019. Analisis Performans Ayam Broiler Pada Kandang Tertutup Dan Kandang Terbuka Performance Analysis Of Broiler In Closed House And Opened House. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 5(2), 77-86.

Pakage, S., B. Hartono, Z. Fanani, B. A.Nugroho, dan D. A. Iyai. 2019. Analisis Fungsi Biaya Stochastic Frontier Usaha Peternakan Ayam Pedaging pada Peternak yang Menggunakan Open House System. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan dan Veteriner Tropis 9 (1): 32-37.

Pakage, S., Hartono, Z., Fanani, B. A., Nugroho, D. A., Iyai, J. A., Palulungan, A. R., Ollong, & Nurhayati, D. 2020. Pengukuran performa produksi ayam pedaging pada close house system dan open house system Kabupaten Malang jawa Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 15(4), 383-389.

Pandey, J., Osak, R., & Pangemanan, S. P. 2022. Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Ayam Pedaging Pola Kemitraan. Studi Kasus Di Kelurahan Pinaras Tomohon Selatan. Kota Tomohon. Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 10(2)

Patria, C. A. 2022. Pola Kandang Tertutup Dua Lantai Pada Broiler Di Edi Sujarwo Farm Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Peterpan. Jurnal Peternakan Terapan, 4(2), 45-51.

Poudel, U., U. Dahal,N. Upadhyaya, S. Chaudhari, and S. Dhakal. 2020. Livestock And Poultry Production In Nepal And Current Status Of Vaccine Development. Vaccines. 8(2): 1–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines 8020322

Prasetyo, A. K. 2020, Desember. Pengaruh Penggunaan Berbagai Model Tempat Pakan Terhadap Performan Ayam Petelur Selama Masa Brooding. In Seminar Nasional Kahuripan (pp. 121-125).

Purwantoro D. 2015. Tingkatkan Produksi Broiler Dengan Cara Modern Closed House. Dhanang Closed House.Com/Tingkatkan Produksi Broiler dengan Cara Moden. 19 Februari 2015.

Qurniawan, A. 2016. Kualitas daging dan performa ayam broiler di kandang terbuka pada ketinggian tempat pemeliharaan yang berbeda di Kabupaten Takalar Sulawesi Selatan. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Tesis.

Rasyaf, M. 2011. Panduan BeternakAyam Pedaging. Penerbit Swadaya.Jakarta

Risnajati, D. 2012. Perbandingan Bobot Akhir, Bobot Karkas dan Persentase Karkas Berbagai Strain Ayam Pedaging. Sains Peternakan 10 (1): 11-14.

Saputra, T. H., Nova, K., & Septinova, D. 2015. Pengaruh penggunan berbagai jenis litter terhadap bobot hidup, karkas, giblet, dan lemak abdominal broiler fase finisher di closed house. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 3(1), 38-44.

Sitorus, M., Horhoruw, W. M., & Rehatta, L. M. 2023. Performance Broiler Strain Lohman and Strain Cibadak Raised In Postal with System Semi Clouse House. Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech, 2(1), 192-201.

Susantho, A. H., Dan Agustine, R., 2022. Evaluasi Kandang Semi-Closed Housepola Kemitraan Inti-Plasma Studi Kasus: Peternak Plasma PT XYZ. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Dan Pendidikan Vokasi Pertanian. Vol. 3, No. 1, Pp. 331-347.

Uman, K. M., S. H. Prayogi, V. M. A. Nurgiartiningsih. 2014. The Performance of Broiler Rearing in System Stage Floor and Double Floor. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 24 (3): 79 – 87.

Widana, I. P. V., Sukanata, I. W., & Kayana, I. G. N. (2019). Analisis kelayakan finansial usaha peternakan ayam broiler dengan sistem kandang closed house, Studi Kasus di PT. Ciomas Adisatwa, Desa Tuwed, Jembrana, Bali. Jurnal Peternakan Tropika, 7(2), 676-694.

Winowoda, B., Salendu, A. H., Manese, M. A., & Umboh, S. J. K. 2020. Analisis Break Even Point Usaha Peternakan Ayam Ras Petelur € Œud. Tetey Permai†Di Kecamatan Dimembe. Zootec, 40(1), 30-41.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36355/sptr.v5i2.1177

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter